There has always been hot debate about what is right and what is wrong at the interface of news reporting and photography, but that is a special case of photojournalism. Not all photojournalism falls into that category by any stretch.

The debate, of course, is how 'true' to the scene are the photographs in question. I, personally, think that the debate is a silly one – because any shooter, whether he or she digitally enhances an image or not, they clearly select out a scene to project to readers which is already baised by the act of selecting one scene over another.

Each of the following images projects a very real part of the Rainbow River Aquatic Preserve in Dunnellon, FL. Both are 'true' reflections of the river; one shows the physical impact of large development, while the other shows the river in a more pristine state. Indeed, the scenes below are of the same exact place on the river, though is shot from the river and the other is shot from the no longer existant understory at the river's edge.

Both images tell quite different stories, eh?

© Dr. Ellen K. Rudolph

© Dr. Ellen K. Rudolph

There is more of an avant guard feel to photojournalistic approaches compared to shots taken by a traditional wedding photographer. Not that one way of shooting is right and the other wrong, they are just different ways of 'seeing."

My approach as a photojournalist in the conservation domain is to tell the story of the damage that human growth and urbanization is perpetrating on our natural world and its wild inhabitants. But instead of just trying to show what is wrong, I try to show how and why it is that such damage is being done and, if possible, how we might even be able to control it.

The urban/wild interface is a challenging one to try to illustrate.

For example, how can I best show the huge and irreversible damage that is being inflicted on the African Elephant? By showing the Elephant in dwindling family groups? By capturing an image of a bloody, ravaged chunk of ivory lying in the red African sand? If I want you to imagine what is happening, then I would probably opt for the bloody chunk of ivory. That image tells a story on its own merits.

Photojournalism is a minimalist approach, in that sense.

Let the photo speak for itself.